StreamingSoundtracks.com
VIP
Subscribe to become a VIP member of SST!

· Request More Often
· Unshared Requests
· Request Countdown Timer
· Request Ready Indicator
· Your Request History
· Access To The VIP Forum
· Add More Favorites

:: Click Here To Upgrade ::

:: Give VIP as a Gift ::

Listen Live!

Donation Meter


Make donations with PayPal!
Monthly Goal:
$500.00

Need:
$162.58

5 Donations:
$337.42

Death.FM (Apr-9) shrike $20.00
StreamingSoundtracks.com (Apr-8) trailblder $25.00
Death.FM (Apr-2) SeclusionSolution $242.42
StreamingSoundtracks.com (Apr-2) Locutus76 $30.00
Death.FM (Apr-1) valar_morghulis $20.00

 


Last Month's Donors
Death.FM (Mar-29) htmm $13.37
StreamingSoundtracks.com (Mar-27) klingon50 $10.00
Death.FM (Mar-22) chapper $10.00
Death.FM (Mar-17) swissdeath $9.99
Death.FM (Mar-15) osiris $10.00
1980s.FM (Mar-11) Bondstec $15.00




Search

 

SSTore



:: SSTore ::



Recommendations, not ratings?

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    StreamingSoundtracks.com Forum Index -> General
View previous topic :: View next topic 
Author Message
limeychick
Ensign
Ensign



Joined: Mar 12, 2006
Member#: 13685
Posts: 20


limeychick is offline View user's profile Send private message limeychick's Favorites are Private
PostPosted: Mon Mar 12, 2007 6:09 pm   Post subject: Recommendations, not ratings? Reply with quote


Wondering if a simple recommendation system, as opposed to star ratings, might help with the mission of identifying tracks for potential removal.

Instead of having to dole out star ratings, people could just hit a "Recommend this" button while listening to a track. You could then develop a "recommends to number of times played" ratio that wouldn't penalize tracks that nobody bothered to listen to yet.

I don't think people like to spend the amount of mental energy it takes to figure out if something is worth four stars versus five stars.
Australia TheSnowLeopard
Lieutenant Commander
Lieutenant Commander



Joined: Mar 18, 2006
Member#: 13799
Posts: 347
Location: Sydney, Australia

TheSnowLeopard is offline View user's profile Send private message TheSnowLeopard's Favorites are Private
PostPosted: Mon Mar 12, 2007 8:42 pm   Post subject: Re: Recommendations, not ratings? Reply with quote


limeychick wrote:
You could then develop a "recommends to number of times played" ratio that wouldn't penalize tracks that nobody bothered to listen to yet.


I'm not in favour of this. We can't assume that music rarely played or lowly rated is of 'lesser' quality and therefore should be so penalised. Some of the best music here lies undiscovered, underplayed or underappreciated.
_________________
"After dark all cats are leopards." - Native American Proverb
limeychick
Ensign
Ensign



Joined: Mar 12, 2006
Member#: 13685
Posts: 20


limeychick is offline View user's profile Send private message limeychick's Favorites are Private
PostPosted: Wed Mar 14, 2007 8:57 pm   Post subject: Reply with quote


I think you might have misunderstood my suggestion... actually, as I described, the deciding factor would be a RATIO of times played versus number of recommends. If a track was played 100 times and had only five recommends, it would rank lower than something played five times with three recommends. Tracks that hadn't received any plays at all, or few, wouldn't be penalized. Maybe something played 50 times with no recommends would be penalized.
Australia TheSnowLeopard
Lieutenant Commander
Lieutenant Commander



Joined: Mar 18, 2006
Member#: 13799
Posts: 347
Location: Sydney, Australia

TheSnowLeopard is offline View user's profile Send private message TheSnowLeopard's Favorites are Private
PostPosted: Thu Mar 15, 2007 1:12 pm   Post subject: Reply with quote


You would find a strong correlation between times played and rating. We already have a ranking system based on rating, number of voters and number of times played which bears this out. I can't see how substituting a recommendation for a vote would make much of a difference.

limeychick wrote:
Maybe something played 50 times with no recommends would be penalized.


Blood Diamond and Partition have been played 67 and 48 times respectively, without a rating, so they could be penalised? New releases in particular, could suffer under such a system.

I am wary of penalising or removing any music by vote or recommendation, not least because the voting system is not used widely enough by enough people to be fair, and the Number Of Times Played is often reset by JERIC.

I think SST should be an archive of music, great or not-so-great, hated or beloved, overplayed or never played. Any decision to remove music should be done on a case by case basis irrespective of how many times played or rating or recommendation.
_________________
"After dark all cats are leopards." - Native American Proverb
Poland molossus VIP (subscribed member)
Admiral (Administrator)
Admiral (Administrator)



Joined: Aug 09, 2005
Member#: 11167
Posts: 3308
Location: Warsaw & once in a blue moon Szczecin (Poland)

molossus is offline View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail View molossus's Favorites
PostPosted: Thu Mar 15, 2007 2:10 pm   Post subject: Reply with quote


I'm with TheSnowLeopard.
I like his words about SST as an archive of various music. Well said Snow!
_________________
<i>"The piano keys are black and white,
But they sound like a million colors in your mind"</i>
(from "Spider's Web" by <a href="http://katiemelua.com/music/#KatieMelua">Katie Melua</a>)

Avatar is from work of art by Drew Struzan
Display posts from previous:
Post new topic   Reply to topic    StreamingSoundtracks.com Forum Index -> General All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Forums ©


Copyright © 2001-2020 24seven.FM, LLC All rights reserved.
Comments, images, and trademarks are property of their respective owners.
You can syndicate our news using the file backend.php or ultramode.txt. Robots may follow the Sitemap.